Welcome to our quarterly transparency report on AI judge performance.
By the Numbers
- **Total debates judged:** 47,832
- **Average confidence score:** 0.78
- **Appeals requested:** 312 (0.65%)
- **Appeals upheld:** 41 (13% of appeals)
Performance Metrics
| Metric | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human agreement | 85% | 87% | +2% |
| Consistency | 92% | 94% | +2% |
| Avg. response time | 2.3s | 1.8s | -22% |
Major Updates This Quarter
- Improved handling of technical and scientific debates
- Better detection of circular reasoning
- Reduced latency through model optimization
User Feedback Summary
We received 1,247 feedback submissions this quarter: - 78% positive - 15% neutral - 7% negative
Most common complaints were about close decisions (expected) and handling of humor (being addressed).
Looking Ahead
Q1 2025 priorities: - Multi-language support (Spanish first) - Improved explanation generation - Real-time feedback during debates