Back to Blog
Transparency

Q4 2024 AI Judge Transparency Report

Welcome to our quarterly transparency report on AI judge performance.

By the Numbers

  • **Total debates judged:** 47,832
  • **Average confidence score:** 0.78
  • **Appeals requested:** 312 (0.65%)
  • **Appeals upheld:** 41 (13% of appeals)

Performance Metrics

MetricQ3 2024Q4 2024Change
Human agreement85%87%+2%
Consistency92%94%+2%
Avg. response time2.3s1.8s-22%

Major Updates This Quarter

  1. Improved handling of technical and scientific debates
  2. Better detection of circular reasoning
  3. Reduced latency through model optimization

User Feedback Summary

We received 1,247 feedback submissions this quarter: - 78% positive - 15% neutral - 7% negative

Most common complaints were about close decisions (expected) and handling of humor (being addressed).

Looking Ahead

Q1 2025 priorities: - Multi-language support (Spanish first) - Improved explanation generation - Real-time feedback during debates

Frequently Asked Questions

Can people use AI to answer questions?

Yes, we can't stop people from using it so it's a tool in everyone's arsenal.

How does the judging work?

Read our blog post on our AI judge and how we test it and how the judge scores posts.

How do you make sure the AI isn't biased?

See our blog post on bias detection.

Why are you doing this?

To incentivize good thinking and yes, to make money in the process.

What if I want to dispute a judgment?

Email us at support@argyu.com, we'll look into it.

Welcome to Argyu

Choose a username to complete your registration. Your wallet address will be linked to this account.

3-30 characters. Letters, numbers, and underscores only.

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms of Service.